In Reply to: Re: Geo-George display to the masses (more) posted by Hank on July 29, 2002 at 2:18 PM:
Hank,
Thanks for defining the Geo-George notification requirements. Should future Geo-George notifications be posted to (or clutter) the forums, we can 'politely' link your response for reference.
: The bill reports already indicate if it is a GC bill.
Are you referring to Geocache in the 'notes fields'? I did not notice anything else. I was thinking of a separate column, 'Geo-Georged Flagged', like you display the: 'Send Anon e-mail' and 'View User Profile" fields. I was aware that you had created the 'Geocache bills' list. I was thinking on the lines of a Georger was looking at bill report, noticed in the 'notes' field that it was in Geo-Cache and thought, "hmm, I wonder in Hank has already notified." Since you explained what you want from us; now this is a mute point. Duplicate notifications should not occur often. Thanks again.
And thanks for the quick response.
HMG,
: The bill reports already indicate if it is a GC bill.
Are you referring to Geo-cache in the 'notes field'? I did not notice anything else. I was thinking of a separate column, 'Geo-Georged Flagged', like you display the: 'Send Anon e-mail' and 'View User Profile" fields. Since you explained what you want from us, this a now mute point. Duplicate notifications should not be a factor. Thanks again.
Thanks for the quick response.
HMG,
:
: The bill reports already indicate if it is a GC bill. And to keep the entries to a reasonable number, tagging a GC bill only really matters if it enters any of the Top10 lists. So you don't need to send me each and every one-or-none hit bills just because they were found in a geocache. Once it gets four or more hits, then I'm interested in tagging them. Use the contact form to let me know about any other GC bills with lots of hits.
: -Hank